A California child has tested positive for bird flu, raising concerns as there is no known exposure to infected animals. This unusual case highlights the ongoing risks associated with avian influenza and its potential to affect human health.
In recent years, the complexities of mental health care coverage have come under scrutiny, particularly regarding practices employed by major insurers like UnitedHealth Group. Reports reveal that therapists have faced intense questioning from UnitedHealth’s “care advocates” about the frequency of patient visits, leading to numerous denials of coverage for necessary treatments. Such denials have forced patients to either pay out-of-pocket or forgo essential care, regardless of the severity of their conditions.
An investigation into UnitedHealth’s practices uncovered that the company utilized algorithms to identify providers perceived as offering excessive therapy and patients deemed to be receiving too much treatment. This scrutiny intensified after government officials began examining these practices around 2016. By the end of 2021, the algorithmic approach had been deemed illegal in three states; however, UnitedHealth continues to enforce stringent cost-control measures that jeopardize patient access to mental health services.
The insurer’s subsidiary, Optum, has implemented an “outlier management” strategy targeting patients who receive more than 30 therapy sessions in eight months, projecting savings of up to $52 million. This approach underscores a significant gap in regulatory oversight, as UnitedHealth operates across various states with differing regulations.
Despite being one of the largest health insurance providers in the U.S., UnitedHealth is not subject to a single regulatory authority. Each state and federal entity oversees only a portion of its operations, complicating efforts to hold the company accountable for its mental health coverage practices. Advocates argue that a unified regulatory framework is essential to ensure equitable access to mental health care for all patients.
As this situation unfolds, it becomes increasingly clear that comprehensive reform is needed to protect vulnerable populations from restrictive insurance practices that hinder access to critical mental health services.
Read more:
- Possible Bird Flu Case Reported In California Child With No Animal Contact
- Public Health Advocates Call For Urgent Ban On Menthol Cigarettes Amid Political Delays
- What Age Is SIDS No Longer A Risk
